Los Angeles and San Francisco are located in the same state and both are on the Pacific Ocean, yet they are entirely different from each other in terms of daily life, industries, and entertainment options. There’s a lot to like about both cities, and they both offer a great quality of life. So, how do you pick which city to live in?
The following is a look at what both cities have to offer. Comparing Los Angeles versus San Francisco is more about identifying what makes you happy, how to make sure your needs are met, and best of all, how to have a good time while living in either city. Here’s a look at what to expect from LA and SF as places to live.
Location and vibe
Los Angeles is located in Southern California, while San Francisco is located in Northern California. Los Angeles is closer to the Mexican border and is known for its warm, sunny weather and beach culture. San Francisco, on the other hand, is known for its foggy and cooler climate, as well as its location on the Bay Area. Los Angeles is a sprawling city that is home to many different neighborhoods, each with their own distinct culture and style. It is also known for its car culture and traffic congestion. San Francisco, on the other hand, is a more compact city with a rich history and culture. It is known for its steep hills, Victorian architecture, and diverse neighborhoods.
LosAngeles has a more laid-back and relaxed vibe compared to San Francisco’s more fast-paced and startup-driven atmosphere. Los Angeles is known for its entertainment industry and celebrity culture, while San Francisco is known for its tech industry and liberal politics.
Job market and housing
It’s long been known that the main type of industry located in a certain geographic region has a strong influence on the housing prices in the area. LA has its movie studios, and SF has Silicon Valley. Both are economic powerhouses in their own right, but Silicon Valley’s narrow focus on the technology industry has served to push up the price of real estate to astronomical levels in SF.
San Francisco rests on the end of a peninsula, and residents are fighting the push for more density to ease real estate prices. Meanwhile, Los Angeles has a broader base of industries and less in the way of geographic constriction for the construction of residences. Someone looking for work in the entertainment industry has a wider array of job choices than someone who’s looking to work in the tech-heavy region around SF.
It’s easier to find affordable housing in LA than it is in SF, but the type of work someone does has a tendency to dictate which city they’ll reside in. However, there are tech jobs in the LA region, just as there are jobs in the entertainment industry in SF. They’re just not as numerous as they are in the city they’re associated with.
Quality of life
San Francisco is famous for its acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community, and it has long been a destination for those who need to live where their lifestyle is welcomed. LA is also a welcoming place for those who want to live their lifestyle without concern, but it’s also more culturally diverse than SF. This diversity translates into everything from cultural attractions to food and nightlife.
LA is a melting pot of cultures where individuals bring their particular way of life and cuisine to the city. There’s seemingly no end to the small restaurants that feature Asian and Mexican cuisine throughout LA, and they’re often open late into the night for a quick bite to eat. San Francisco is also home to cheap ethnic eats, but they’re not as abundant as they are in LA.
California is known as a car-centric state due to the need to drive everywhere. Public transportation is almost an afterthought in most areas, including LA. You’ll need a car to get around LA and the surrounding areas, but you don’t need a car in SF. Public transportation in SF is robust and covers most of the city, making it easy to get around without ownership of a vehicle. This helps with the cost of living as there’s almost no need to make payments on a car.
Cost of living
It’s no secret that San Francisco is more expensive than Los Angeles and many other cities in California. However, the difference in costs can be surprising, especially when breaking down the costs between the two as listed in Numbeo’s database. A meal at a mid-range restaurant in LA runs around $88, while the same meal costs $100 in SF. On average, consumer prices with rent included are 24.7% higher in San Francisco than in LA, and the cost of groceries is 31.5% higher in SF than they are in LA.
Energy bills are also much higher in SF than they are in LA, but the moderate climate of SF means that there’s less in the way of heating and cooling needs than there are in LA where the temperatures are warmer on average.
Weather
Los Angeles and San Francisco experience different weather patterns due to their locations. LA’s location in Southern California gives it a climate that’s dryer and warmer than San Francisco’s cooler and wetter location in northern California.
According to Weather Spark, the summer highs in Los Angeles during the hottest time of the year are 85 degrees, compared to San Francisco’s highs of 72. Overnight lows reach 72 in LA and 58 in SF. The coldest time of year for LA reaches a high of 65 degrees and an overnight low of 48. Meanwhile, San Francisco has a minimal spread between the two temps, with high 40s during the day and mid-40s at night during the winter.
FAQ: Los Angeles vs. San Francisco
Los Angeles and San Francisco have very different feels in terms of their atmosphere and architecture. San Francisco is older than LA and feels more European with its tightly packed commercial districts and residences. LA has more sprawl and lacks a downtown, but it has a uniquely American feel.
As reported on the state’s government website, the base sales tax rate for California is 7.25%, and municipalities are free to add their own taxes on top of the base rate. The sales tax in San Francisco is 8.625%, while the sales tax in Los Angeles is 9.5%.
San Francisco is generally considered more expensive to live in than Los Angeles, with higher housing costs, food prices, and transportation expenses. However, both cities are among the most expensive in the United States.
Los Angeles is known for its car culture and traffic congestion, but it also has a public transportation system that includes buses and a subway system. However, San Francisco has a more extensive public transportation system, which includes buses, light rail, cable cars, and ferries. If you would prefer not to drive, San Francisco is the better option.
Los Angeles is generally considered to have better beaches than San Francisco. Los Angeles is known for its miles of sandy beaches and warm ocean waters, including popular destinations like Venice Beach, Santa Monica Beach, and Malibu Beach. San Francisco, on the other hand, has cooler water temperatures and more rugged coastline. The city has a few beaches, including Ocean Beach and Baker Beach, but they are often windy and foggy.
Final thoughts
Both cities have their pros and cons when it comes to what they have to offer. If you’re not involved in the technology field and don’t care for the idea of spending your income on the basics of living, you may want to consider LA. However, if you want a laid-back atmosphere and the opportunity to make a difference in people’s lives through the latest technological advances, then San Francisco may be the best place for you to live.
Related content
